Petition to Congress: Examine Radical Islamist Materials

 

picture-3.png

 

National Petition Campaign Launched 

Please Sign the Petition Today and

 

Forward It To Everyone You Know !!

 

This is must read for every patriotic American.

 

 

Some who read this are thinking, “another nut group out to save America from a phantom nonexistent enemy, and besides, Islam is a peace loving respected religion. Aren’t they making mountains out of molehills?” The facts simply do not support such frog in the pan thinking.

 

Act! for America has just completed a national poll, done by a reputable polling company. The results of this poll are impressive. America really does get it and realizes we have a problem, but we don’t begin to understand how far the Muslim Jihadists have penetrated into our country and culture. They are rapidly gaining strength and influence over critical areas, e.g., banking and financial institutions, colleges/universities, curriculum development for our public schools, medicine, and etc. They are seeking and winning major political offices across the country. America understands we have a problem, but what to do about it?

 

The just completed national poll mentioned above has birthed The Petition of which this email is about.  The poll is the most sophisticated data on how Americans perceive the threat of Islamic Fundamentalism. The results are absolutely staggering. ACT! for America, at considerable cost, has taken the results of this poll and created The Petition.  In September, ACT will take this petition with thousands, hopefully millions of signatures to Congress. But wait, I’m getting ahead of myself

 

Please, you must read on.

It is vital to your life.

It is critical for our country.

 

On Tuesday evening  ACT! For America held it’s second Telephone Town Hall. Hundreds were on the call. Brigitte Gabriel (founder of ACT) made the exciting announcement about this petition.. She reported that The Petition, the “Petition Calling for Congressional Hearings to Review Radical Islamist Materials Distributed in American Mosques,” has been launched. She further reported, that American Mosque have have become the primary training sites for terrorist activities in America.

 

The petition begins with these words:

 

We the American people call on our U.S. Congress to conduct hearings for the purpose of examining extremist materials that have been found in American mosques that:

  • exhort Muslims to engage in holy war (jihad) against us;
  • incite terror and violence against us;
  • call for abolishing our constitutional form of government and replacing it with the theological totalitarianism of strict Islamic law, known as “sharia.”

The petition includes some examples of such materials, and then closes with these words:

 

Since there is sufficient evidence to indicate that the information in some materials sold or distributed in mosques in America rises to the level of a genuine threat to our nation’s security and liberty;

 

Since it is the first responsibility of our federal government to safeguard the national security of our country and its citizens and guests;

 

And because the oath of office of a Member of Congress is an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution;

 

We, the undersigned, call upon Congress to conduct hearings to examine materials that have been uncovered that have been sold or distributed in mosques in the United States, to determine if these materials violate federal statutes governing tax-exempt organizations; to determine if these materials violate federal anti-terrorism statutes; and to determine if these materials violate federal statutes prohibiting sedition, the advocacy and/or effort of abolishing or overthrowing our constitutional form of government.

 

To read The Complete Petition, sign it and forward it to others!

 

Brigitte Gabriel, a Lebanese by birth and an American by choice has said, 

 

“As we announced on the Town Hall last night, this petition drive is going to be unprecedented in scope on an issue such as this. Not only are we emailing you the petition and asking you to forward it to others, we are going to be sending millions of emails over the next few months to people who likely share our concerns about the nature of these materials, and asking them to sign the petition.

 

We will provide you numerous updates over the next few months as to the progress of our campaign. In the meantime, please click here to read and sign

 

 The Petition.

 

Then follow the easy directions to forward the petition to everyone you know.”

Will you join us?

Will you be a light on a hill?

 

Today ACT! for America is 40,000 strong, growing at approximately 10,000 per month. Members are being added daily. Each week dozens of local chapters are rising up across our nation. We are patriots committed to stemming the tide of Islamic Fundamentalism. We invite you to join us now.

 

Thank you so much for your support and your commitment in helping us roll back the tide of Islamic Fundamentalism?

 

Together we rise in defense of our security, our liberty and our values.”

 

Dan

Act! for America Coachella Valley

 

You can make a Difference.

Read the full petition,

sign it and forward it to others!

Act! for America’s Congressional Petition

 

P.S. When signing the petition you will be ask for some basic information. Be assured that this is used only by ACT! for America. It will not be sold or given to others. While you are there signing the petition, go ahead and join us as an ACT member. You will sleep better. 

“Moderate” Muslims and what Islam teaches about “Kafirs”

 

Kafir Dreams, By Jamie Glazov, FrontPageMagazine.com 5/7/2008

 

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) and spokesman for PoliticalIslam.com.

 

FP: Bill Warner, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Warner: Thank you Jamie.

 

FP: I’d like to talk to you today about how many of the names, words and phrases we use about Islam are muddled and incorrect. Many non-Muslims create certain terms about Islam to try to make the world seem safer and to feel good about themselves. But many of these terms have no actual basis in Islamic theology or culture and have no real meaning in an Islamic context.

I think the best way to start this discussion is to begin with the term “moderate Muslim.”

 

Warner: “Moderate Muslim” is a perfect example of the muddle and incorrect terminology that kafirs (unbelievers) use.

 

This term is intended to describe a Muslim who doesn’t seem dangerous or advocate violence. But “moderate Muslim” is a non-Muslim name, one that kafirs made up. The doctrine of Islam does talk about the different kinds of Muslims. The measure of a Muslim is the Koran and the Sunna. Anyone who follows these teachings is a moderate Muslim, by definition. Islamic doctrine defines what is moderate and not moderate. Since we are dealing with Islam, we need to know that the doctrine is dualistic. Islam can have two doctrines about any issue. This follows from the Koran. The early Koran, which was written in Mecca is generally religious. The Koran written in Medina is very political and includes jihad. The two Korans are not only very different, but they also contradict each other in major ways.

 

So we have the possibility of two kinds of moderate Muslims, since we have two doctrines. Osama bin Laden is a moderate Muslim, who follows the Koran of Medina, the Koran of jihad. Kafirs call him an extremist or radical Muslim. Actually, Osama obeys the Koran of Medina and the Sunna of Mohammed, so he is a moderate, pious Medinan Muslim.

 

The jihadists on September 11, 2001 were all moderate Medinan Muslims. They were not extremists or radicals.

 

The other kind of moderate Muslim follows the Koran of Mecca and he is more generally what kafirs mean when they say “moderate Muslim.” But how moderate is a Meccan Muslim? A moderate Muslim thinks that you are a kafir, but he isn’t violent, just antagonistic.

 

FP: So tell us exactly what “kafir” means. We take it to mean unbeliever but I presume it is more complicated than that.

 

Warner: The usual translation of this Arabic word is unbeliever, but unbeliever is only a very small part of its meaning. It is the Koran that defines the word “kafir” and it says the most terrible things can happen to them. The Koranic doctrine about kafirs says they are hated and are Satan’s friends. Kafirs can be robbed, killed, tortured, raped, mocked, cursed, condemned and plotted against. The Koran does not have one good thing to say about kafirs. (There are some psuedo-good words, but more about them later.)

 

For over the last 1400 years, 270 million kafirs have died as a result of the political doctrine of Islam. It is the biggest single source of suffering in the history of the world. The word kafir is the worst word in the human language. It is far worse than the n-word, because the n-word is a personal opinion, whereas, kafir is Allah’s decree. Nearly two thirds of the Koran is devoted to the kafir. Islam is fixated on the kafir and the moderate Muslim thinks that you are a kafir. How moderate is that?

 

FP: I guess not very moderate.

Warner: Well the moderation does not stop there. A moderate Muslim follows Islamic ethics. Not only is the Koran a dualistic document, but also Islamic ethics are dualistic. Islam has one set of rules for Muslims and another set of rules for the kafirs. A Muslim does not lie, cheat, kill, or harm another Muslim. But, if it will advance Islam, a kafir may be cheated, deceived, murdered, tortured and raped. Or a Muslim may treat a kafir like a brother.

 

It is the dualism of Islam that gives it such power. It has the entire good cop/bad cop psychology built into its very DNA. There have been other groups with dualistic ethics, the KKK for instance. But a member of the KKK hates all blacks all the time. There is a certain bald-faced honesty in the hatred of the KKK. But Islam has the good cop face to the world most of the time. The bad cop is held in reserve the same way that a police detective carries a hidden weapon.

 

The ethical dualism means that Islam does not take part in the shared reciprocity of altruism. As an example, Islam is very big on charity, but Islamic charity only goes to Muslims. When Saudi Arabia sent money to New Orleans after hurricane Katrina, the money only went to Muslims, not to suffering kafirs.

 

FP: Can you expand a bit on reciprocity of altruism?

Warner: Reciprocity of altruism[1] is the very basis of civilization. Islam does not share this trait. This is one of the reasons that Islam is not a part, nor can it be, of kafir civilization. Islam is built on different ethics and logic than the kafirs. Islam’s dualistic ethics prohibit reciprocity of altruism. Islamic civilization and kafir civilization do not share similar values.

 

So a moderate non-violent Muslim thinks that you are a kafir and that a kafir does not have to be treated the same as another Muslim. The moderate Muslim (Islamic meaning) thinks that you are Allah’s scum and you can be treated like trash. Or not (dualism always has options).

 

How can such a person be a true friend, if he believes the Koran. In some 14 verses, the Koran says that the Muslim is not the friend of a kafir. But what if the person actually is your friend? We can deal with this very important question if you wish.

 

In any case, the term moderate Muslim has two totally different meanings. The kafir meaning is warm, fuzzy and incorrect. The Islamic meaning is cruel, precise and correct.

 

Read the complete article online at 

 

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=76B12F33-3165-47D1-80ED-C3F1ACD07D8A

ACT Poll Results

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Poll Results: Random sample survey of 800 American voters.

Margin of Error: +/- 3.46% at the .95 level of confidencePoll Results:


Random sample survey of 800 American voters.

Margin of Error: +/- 3.46% at the .95 level of confidence


Conducted April 14-16, 2008

 

NOTE: AS IS COMMON IN REPORTING POLL RESULTS, PERCENTAGES FROM RESPONSES ARE ROUNDED UP OR DOWN TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER FOR EASE OF READING. THIS MEANS THAT IN SOME CASES RESULT TOTALS PROVIDED ARE SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT YOU WILL GET IF YOU ADD THEM TOGETHER. SEE, FOR INSTANCE, QUESTION FIVE: 58% STRONGLY DISAGREE, 15% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE, BUT BOTH NUMBERS ARE ROUNDED DOWN TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER, SO IF YOU WERE TO ADD THEM YOU WOULD GET A TOTAL OF 73% DISAGREED. BUT THE ACTUAL, CORRECT TOTAL IS 74%, WHICH IS WHAT IS REPORTED IN THE RESULTS. SO WHEREVER THERE APPEARS TO BE A DISCREPANCY IN THE TOTALING OF RESPONSE PERCENTAGES, NO DISCREPANCY EXISTS AND THE NUMBERS PROVIDED ARE ACCURATE.

 

Hello, this is (FIRST AND LAST NAME). We are conducting a survey among voters regarding issues in your part of the state and would like to include your views in our study. I assure you we are only seeking opinions and there will be no attempt to sell you anything or solicit a donation.

 

Could I speak to a member of the house who is registered to vote?

 

I’m going to read you several statements. (Rotate) Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with each statement. IF AGREE/DISAGREE: Is that strongly agree/disagree or somewhat agree/disagree?

 

Scale

 

strongly agree

somewhat agree

(DON’T READ) don’t know

somewhat disagree

strongly disagree

 

1. The FBI has a shortage of Arabic translators capable of translating intelligence that might provide leads to terrorist activity. In spite of this shortage, for the past few years the FBI has rejected most Christian and Jewish applicants who are fluent in Arabic, preferring to limit its hiring almost exclusively to Muslim applicants. Do you agree or disagree with the FBI’s Arabic translator hiring policy?

 

strongly agree 8%

somewhat agree 8%

Total agree 16%

don’t know 15%

Total disagree 69%

somewhat disagree 19%

strongly disagree 50%

 

2. It is becoming increasingly common for Muslim employees in America to ask employers for five break times daily for prayer, separate prayer rooms in the workplace, and time off for Friday mosque attendance and prayer. Do you agree or disagree that employers should be required to provide such accommodations for their Muslim employees?

 

strongly agree 13%

somewhat agree 11%

Total agree 24%

don’t know 5%

Total disagree 71%

somewhat disagree 15%

strongly disagree 56%

 

For the rest of the poll please visit http://www.actforamerica.org/poll-results/