ACT Poll Results

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Poll Results: Random sample survey of 800 American voters.

Margin of Error: +/- 3.46% at the .95 level of confidencePoll Results:


Random sample survey of 800 American voters.

Margin of Error: +/- 3.46% at the .95 level of confidence


Conducted April 14-16, 2008

 

NOTE: AS IS COMMON IN REPORTING POLL RESULTS, PERCENTAGES FROM RESPONSES ARE ROUNDED UP OR DOWN TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER FOR EASE OF READING. THIS MEANS THAT IN SOME CASES RESULT TOTALS PROVIDED ARE SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT YOU WILL GET IF YOU ADD THEM TOGETHER. SEE, FOR INSTANCE, QUESTION FIVE: 58% STRONGLY DISAGREE, 15% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE, BUT BOTH NUMBERS ARE ROUNDED DOWN TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER, SO IF YOU WERE TO ADD THEM YOU WOULD GET A TOTAL OF 73% DISAGREED. BUT THE ACTUAL, CORRECT TOTAL IS 74%, WHICH IS WHAT IS REPORTED IN THE RESULTS. SO WHEREVER THERE APPEARS TO BE A DISCREPANCY IN THE TOTALING OF RESPONSE PERCENTAGES, NO DISCREPANCY EXISTS AND THE NUMBERS PROVIDED ARE ACCURATE.

 

Hello, this is (FIRST AND LAST NAME). We are conducting a survey among voters regarding issues in your part of the state and would like to include your views in our study. I assure you we are only seeking opinions and there will be no attempt to sell you anything or solicit a donation.

 

Could I speak to a member of the house who is registered to vote?

 

I’m going to read you several statements. (Rotate) Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with each statement. IF AGREE/DISAGREE: Is that strongly agree/disagree or somewhat agree/disagree?

 

Scale

 

strongly agree

somewhat agree

(DON’T READ) don’t know

somewhat disagree

strongly disagree

 

1. The FBI has a shortage of Arabic translators capable of translating intelligence that might provide leads to terrorist activity. In spite of this shortage, for the past few years the FBI has rejected most Christian and Jewish applicants who are fluent in Arabic, preferring to limit its hiring almost exclusively to Muslim applicants. Do you agree or disagree with the FBI’s Arabic translator hiring policy?

 

strongly agree 8%

somewhat agree 8%

Total agree 16%

don’t know 15%

Total disagree 69%

somewhat disagree 19%

strongly disagree 50%

 

2. It is becoming increasingly common for Muslim employees in America to ask employers for five break times daily for prayer, separate prayer rooms in the workplace, and time off for Friday mosque attendance and prayer. Do you agree or disagree that employers should be required to provide such accommodations for their Muslim employees?

 

strongly agree 13%

somewhat agree 11%

Total agree 24%

don’t know 5%

Total disagree 71%

somewhat disagree 15%

strongly disagree 56%

 

For the rest of the poll please visit http://www.actforamerica.org/poll-results/

 

Islamofascism – Is the word Inflammatory? See PETITION!

I was troubled by the word “Islamofascist,” that is until I looked a little closer. I thank our San Francisco chapter leader  for this information about the State Department dropping all references  to such words as “Jihadist” and “Islamofascist”, etc. Below is information and A PETITION for YOU to sign. It is going to the US House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. You can elect (check appropriate box) to keep your e-mail address confidential.

THE RIGHT QUESTION:

STOP USING ISLAMOFASCISM?

by Dr. Steve Carol ©Sept. 25, 2006

(featured on the www. at Canada Free Press.com, Sept. 30, 2006, in

the East Valley Tribune, October 3, 2006 – “Senator Has It All Wrong,” as the basis of the Rabbi’s sermon on Yom Kippur, Oct. 2, 2006 at Metropolitan Synagogue, New York and in the Jewish News of Greater Phoenix, Oct. 13, 2006)

On September 12th, Senator Russell Feingold (D-Wis) a once a contender for the 2008 presidential nomination called on President Bush to stop using the term “Islamic fascism” as it harmed the war on terrorism. Specifically Feingold stated: “I call on the president to immediately stop using the phrase ‘Islamic fascism,’ a label that doesn’t make any sense, and certainly doesn’t help our effort to fight terrorism.” That he told this to a delegation of the Arab American Institute, may just be coincidental.

What is of greater concern is that a presidential contender seems not to understand the definition of fascism and its modern variant, Islamofascism (or Islamic fascism). This is not a recent term. It was introduced by French writer Maxine Rodinson to describe the Iranian Revolution of 1978-79.

A quick review of ideology is in order. Different ideologies should be part of any history and government class in the United States. No other type of ideology, (democracy, communism, or despotism) matches what our enemy stands for as does the ideology of fascism. Islamofascism is the Islamic jihadist ideology grafted onto the totalitarian dictatorial system of fascism where the goals of Islam are more important than that of the individual. It seeks to re-create a mythical past. Glorification of war, violence, intimidation, belligerency, superiority over non-believers, anti-Semitism and anti-liberalism are all components of this ideology. An examination of events before and after 9/11 show that the definition is both sound and accurate. The pairing of the two words “Islamic” and “fascism” conveys a precise message: the old fascism is back, but driven by a radical fundamentalist creed of Islam. Who are the Islamofascists? They are the practitioners of militant Islam. Militant Islam contains elements of terrorism, religious fundamentalism, and the exploitation of social and economic injustice. It has ideological fervor, it has global reach, it is ambitious and it has staying power. They seek to re-create the Caliphate that once existed from southern France, to the gates of Vienna, to the plains of India, the steppes of Russia and western China – and then once regaining that, beyond. Islamofascism is now a global threat because certain Arab and Muslim governments have chosen to export it.

Senator Feingold claims the term does not make any sense. Yes, that applies, but not to the term “Islamofascism” but rather to the term he prefers: “terror.” We are not in a war against terror any more than the U.S. was in a war against trenches in World War I, a war against blitzkrieg and kamikaze in World War II and a war against blockade during the Cold War. Trench warfare, blitzkrieg, kamikaze, blockade and terror are all tactics employed in a war. Wars have identifiable enemies and ideologies. Fascism (and its German variant Nazism) during World War II and communism during the Cold War. The hostile ideology that currently seeks to destroy the American way of life, our free and democratic system and values is Islamofascism.

President Bush, has finally used the term “Islamic fascism” to describe the enemy ideology, albeit once. The PC crowd as well as apologists for the Islamofascists, have sought to prevent the use of that term. Continued use of the term “war on terror” clouds the issue, confuses many, and seriously divides our nation. While Americans – Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives – continue to argue about whether or not we should or shouldn’t use the term “Islamofascism” and continue to deal with our Islamofascist enemies with one hand tied behind our back under “Marquis of Queensbury” rules – our enemies sharpen their figurative and literal swords and plan new acts of terror against us. “[Islamic fascism] doesn’t make sense” intones Senator Feingold. On the contrary, both by definition and deed it makes absolute sense. Rather than take the Senator’s suggestion not to use the term, Americans all, should increase their usage of it. As the Chinese general and author, Sun Tzu, advised over 2000 years ago: “Know thy enemy.”

Dr. Steven Carol

Prof. of History (retired)

Official historian on The Middle East Radio Forum www.middleeastradioforum.org

Scottsdale, Arizona

THE PETITION

Don’t passively acquiesce to the curbing of our use of the correct terms to describe our global enemy. During World War II the enemy was properly called “Nazis, fascists, and militarists”; during the Cold War they were properly called “communists.” There is no need to obscure the truth. Take action. Please sign and pass on to all on your mailing list.

THANK YOU

These are internal guidelines by the Department of State. Hoekstra tried to prohibit such nonsense with an amendment in the Intel Committee but failed.

Say NO to Shariah Compliant Financing! A Petition

The Jihad is like a giant octopus spreading it’s tentacles throughout Europe and America. Our banks and financial institutions are being infiltrated at an alarming rate. For detail information go to the bottom of this page. You will see “Previous Entries.” Click on that for previous posts. Scroll down the page. You will find two excellent articles on this subject, “Shariah Compliant Financing Described As the New Islamic Threat”, and “Jihad Comes to Wall Street.”After reading these articles you will agree that Shariah Compliancy in our banking institutions will create a deadly consequences to our already fragile  economy, forcing us to be subject to the laws of Islam (Shariah Law), and eventually jeopardizing our security and democracy.  We need to collect thousands of signatures which will then be sent to SEC, Department of Justice, FBI, CSP, US Treasury Department, and any others thought to be committed to our protection. Your email address will be completely secure. Please sign the petition at

http://www.petitiononline.com/qxyz1108/petition.html

Congresswoman Myrick’s takes aim at terrorism

 

 

Rep. Sue Myrick

LISA ZAGAAROLI – McClatchy Newspapers 

Rep. Sue Myrick wants America to “wake up” and stop allowing terrorism to proliferate — and if that means revoking the passport of a former U.S. president or examining the preaching of prison chaplains, that’s what she’s prepared to do.

The Charlotte Republican on Friday released a list of 10 items she hopes will help peel back the layers on how radical elements of Islam might be infiltrating the military, school rooms and other elements of society. She also wants to stop the government from supporting terrorist organizations through financial investments and military sales.

Earlier this week, she called for President Jimmy Carter’s passport to be revoked because he met with Hamas, a Palestinian group that the U.S. government says supports terrorism.

“His actions reward terrorists, lend support and provide legitimacy to their belief that violence will eventually get them what they want,” Myrick said. Carter could not be reached on Friday.

The co-founder of the House anti-terrorism caucus has spent an increasing amount of time trying to tackle what she views as threats posed at home by extremists, an issue that fuels her commitment to deporting illegal immigrants.

One candidate who’s trying to prevent her re-election this year, Democrat Harry Taylor of Charlotte, has questioned her priorities and said she has spent too little time fixing the health-care system, solving the energy crisis and helping her constituents’ every-day lives.

Myrick said her views are in sync with her district’s.

“When I talk to them at home about this stuff, they get it,” she said of her terrorism concerns. “It’s just that it is complicated. People would rather watch `American Idol.’ “

Myrick acknowledged that her 10-point plan, “Wake Up America,” might hit stumbling blocks in Washington. But she thinks it’s time to start demanding answers. She said she was releasing her agenda now after carefully researching which issues had the potential for solutions.

“We put this together really to try to get a dialogue going,” she said. “It’s a beginning point.”

Among her goals is to investigate Muslim military and prison chaplains who were endorsed by a man now in prison for funding terrorism, and examine the nonprofit status of an organization partially funded by Saudis.

That group, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, says her assumptions are wrong.

“It sounds like your usual laundry list of talking points you can see on anti-Muslim hate sites on the Internet,” said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Washington-based Islamic civil rights and advocacy group.

Though she’s steadfast, Myrick has said in the past that she understands some folks might view her concerns that terrorists are infiltrating the United States as over the top, but that she bases her work on research and the advice of experts.

“This could all sound fanatical if people don’t know about it,” she said in an interview with the Observer a few months ago. “I’m not a radical person.”

Political science professor Ted Arrington of UNC Charlotte said she should be applauded for tackling a tough issue. It’s up to others, he said, to judge whether she’s doing it in a way that plays on people’s fears.

Myrick’s 10-point plan

1. Investigate all military chaplains endorsed by Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was imprisoned for funding a terrorist organization.

2. Investigate all prison chaplains endorsed by Alamoudi.

3. Investigate the selection process of Arabic translators working for the Pentagon and FBI.

4. Examine the nonprofit status of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

5. Make it an act of sedition or solicitation of treason to preach or publish materials that call for the deaths of Americans.

6. Audit sovereign wealth funds in the United States.

7. Cancel scholarship student visa program with Saudi Arabia until they reform their text books, which she claims preach hatred and violence against non-Muslims.

8. Restrict religious visas for imams who come from countries that don’t allow reciprocal visits by non-Muslim clergy.

9. Cancel contracts to train Saudi police and security in U.S. counterterrorism tactics.

10. Block the sale of sensitive military munitions to Saudi Arabia.

Kuwait Sovereign Fund May Boost Citi, Merrill Stakes

By Jesse Westbrook and Peter Cook

 

 

May 1 (Bloomberg) — Kuwait’s $250 billion sovereign wealth fund may boost its stakes in Citigroup Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. as it pursues investments in companies battered by subprime- mortgage related losses.

“The valuation in the markets in the U.S. and Europe, we think, has created a lot of opportunities,” Bader al-Saad, the Kuwait Investment Authority’s managing director, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television today. “We have confidence in the management” of Citigroup and Merrill, he said. Shares of both companies rose in New York trading.

 

The KIA in January bought a $3 billion stake in Citigroup and invested $2 billion in Merrill to help replenish capital at the companies after they suffered writedowns on mortgages, bonds and loans. Banks and securities firms have absorbed more than $300 billion of losses since the collapse of the subprime- mortgage crisis set off a global credit contraction.

Al-Saad said his fund also purchased a 5 percent stake in Related Cos., a closely held residential property developer based in New York. The KIA moved away from pursuing investments in developing nations last year to focus on financial and real estate companies in the U.S. and Europe, al-Saad said.

“This is a temporary shift,” he said. Read the entire article at

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a6APbY3RZb9g 

The silent jihad against the west

THURSDAY, MAY 1, 2008
Anyone that cares to learn about what is going on in the world is familiar with active jihad, the “holy war”, conducted with terrorism and directed at the modern world in general and western civilization more specifically. But there is also another form of jihad that is part of the deliberate effort to have Islam replace all concepts of morality and the values held dear by the rest of us. The name of this silent “fifth column” effort is “Sharia Banking”. Unfortunately, Sharia Banking is increasingly accepted by western banking institutions without any real understanding of what the Muslim goal is and what is at stake in the efforts by these institutions to attract more business, profits and money to bail them out of financial messes they brought upon themselves.

Islamic Sharia banking is coming to the United States and other western nations, thanks to global banks such as Citigroup, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. Great Britain is now pledging to become the Islamic banking center of the world. Clearly the headlong rush by all global banks to enter the world of Islamic banking is well underway. Why do western banks seek to participate in Sharia banking; because it gives them a chance to enter the Islamic banking industry which has over $1.5 trillion available today and is growing at a steady and explosive rate of over 15% per year.

The implications for the west, and especially for the United States, are staggeringly destructive. Islamic banking working through global banks is doing for Islam what it could never do on its own: giving legitimacy to Sharia law and infiltrating it into the fabric of western society.

For those not familiar with Sharia Banking; it is a system which creates and sells services and products that are in strict accordance with Sharia law. Sometimes it is referred to in the Islamic culture as “Sharia finance”. It dictates how the practices of banking, investment, bonds, loans, brokerage, etc, are to be conducted.

To insure compliance and to become “Sharia banking” compliant, banks must hire Sharia experts to review and approve each product and practice of the bank. This is known as “halal”, which has been described as “the Muslim equivalent of kosher in Judaism.” There is a shortage of such Sharia experts so there is competition among banks to find such experts to sit on their boards of directors. By having an “expert” involved in banking decisions, this provides the legitimacy to each banking decision because it is made at the director rather management level. However, most of these Sharia experts” are from the radical Wahhabi school of Islam in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, and they hold views diametrically opposed to the basic values of Western civilization.

The Center for Security has identified some of the Sharia experts sitting on the boards of U.S. financial institutions. The top twenty “advisors” include many with conflicts of interests and anti-trust issues since they sit on boards of many Islamic banks at the same time. The Center for Security identifies a couple of advisors with ties to money-laundering and terrorism:

Yousuf Quaradawi who is prominent in the Muslim Brotherhood, owns two banks himself and has issued statements in support of Palestinian attacks on Israeli citizens and has issued rulings supporting Hamas and Hezbollah jihad attacks against Israel.

Muhammad Yaqui Usami who is a radical cleric and Sharia court judge in Pakistan. He is on the board of organizations that train thousands of Taliban and jihad foot soldiers. But the most heinous thing is his complicity in the murder and suffering of countless innocent Muslims as apostates because they disagreed with his Islamic mandates.

These are the kinds of people advising U.S. banks on how to conduct their business to assure they are “Sharia compliant”.

There are many differences of Sharia banks from orthodox banking. In Sharia banking interest (deemed “usury” regardless of rate or amount) cannot be charged, and investments must not be associated in any way with gambling, drinking alcohol, eating pork, etc. Very importantly, it calls for alms giving, referred to in Islamic parlance as “zakat”.

Zakat demands a tithe of 2.5 percent of revenue be donated to Islamic charity. If western banks follow this rule, it is certain that a portion of this money will end up in the hands of radical Muslims who are sworn to destroy the United States and replace our government with Sharia law.

For those unfamiliar with it, Sharia law is the legal and judicial system of Islam that is brutally imposed on many Islamic countries in the Middle East. It is the embodiment of the totalitarian ideology practiced by the Taliban, Iranian Mullahs and Saudi Wahhabis.

Sharia law is perpetuated by claiming to have its roots in the Koran, but it is actually for the most part based on rulings and dictates made by Islamic scholars and caliphs over several centuries. Non Muslims know Sharia law’s practices of harsh brutality and punishment as well as the total subjugation of women from newspaper articles describing the many rulings handed down by Sharia courts. These actions have shocked the western world; here are a few examples that have been written in various press accounts:

“The December, 2007 “teddy bear” case in Sudan, where a British teacher was sentenced to 40 lashes and a year in jail for allowing her students to name their teddy bear “Mohammad.” Islamic mobs demonstrated in the streets and called for her execution. The November, 2007 case where a 19 year old gang-rape victim in Saudi Arabia received a sentence of 200 lashes for riding in the car with her rapists. In 2006, a 34 year-old mother who was forcibly raped was ultimately tried and convicted of adultery, and was ordered to be stoned to death. Publication of cartoons in Denmark deemed disrespectful of Mohammad which caused endless demonstrations and mayhem, as well as the killing of many people.”

Islam and Sharia law demands total and unquestioned submission. Its followers are told that Sharia law is given by Allah and that whatever befalls them (good or bad) is “Allah’s will.” To question a judgment under Sharia (right or wrong) is to question Islam itself and will only bring harsh punishment. Curiously, by Islamic thinking if a person receives harsh punishment for something they didn’t do is nonetheless acceptable; the rationale being that Allah could and would have prevented it if that had been his will. This fatalistic approach which is contrary to what all other societies believe allows Islamic rulers to get away with virtually any thing they choose to do.

International bankers have long ago proven themselves to be completely amoral when it comes to money. They financed the Bolshevik Revolution in 1918 just as readily as they financially supported Hitler in the 1930’s. Now they are doing the same for the Islamists that want to destroy western civilization just as the communists and Nazis tried unsuccessfully to do before.

Unfortunately the odds of Islamic success are very different than the earlier threats. For one thing there are about 1.5 billion Muslims in the world and Islam is the fastest growing religion in history. Secondly, the spread of Islam is financed by the oil that is extracted from mid-eastern countries and thirdly, Islam has already infiltrated most of the west, especially in Europe. Now Islam has the combined support and encouragement of the entire global banking community.

There is an unholy alliance between Islam and global banking which may be the final nail in the coffin of western civilization in the historic quest for Islamic global domination. Remember that the next time you hear Islamist mobs chant “Death to America” – and don’t take it so lightly.

POSTED BY VINCENT G. GIOIA AT 7:48 AM